Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1331
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavid Tate
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T17:51:58Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T17:51:58Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-05
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1331-
dc.descriptionAcquisition Management / Defense Acquisition Community Contributor
dc.description.abstractAcquisition cycle time roughly speaking, the development lead time to field a working system once we have identified a need for a new materiel solution is a hot topic in defense circles. This work takes a data-driven look at historical and current acquisition program cycle times. We show that the trend toward longer cycle times over the past few decades is restricted to a handful of high-profile programs, which has profound implications for effective policy response. We also show evidence that cycle times are driven by system complexity, and that schedule slip is associated primarily with overly optimistic schedule estimates. We conclude with a discussion of the increasing importance of software for development lead times, and the general problem of trading capability for timeliness in acquisition programs.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCycle Time
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSYM-AM-16-027
dc.subjectAcquisition Cycle Time
dc.subjectProgram Cycle Time
dc.titleAcquisition Cycle Time: Defining the Problem
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SYM-AM-16-027.pdf544.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.