Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1421
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChong Wang
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T17:58:47Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T17:58:47Z-
dc.date.issued2017-03-30
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1421-
dc.descriptionAcquisition Management / Defense Acquisition Community Contributor
dc.description.abstractTINA, as it currently stands, is a one-size-fits-all prescription. Specifically, TINA does not differentiate among various settings involving different acquisition category, acquisition life cycle, and corresponding preferred contract type. We propose to tailor the use or disuse of TINA to different scenarios by considering the economic incentives created by TINA enforcement. In some settings where TINA is misplaced, we propose to drop TINA to remove the ill incentives and consequent unintended negative consequences. In other settings where TINA brings more benefit than cost, we recommend keeping TINA in place. In a few settings where the judgment is not unambiguous, we propose to leave the discretion to decision makers.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAcquisition
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSYM-AM-17-045
dc.subjectTINA
dc.subjectTruth in Negotiations Act
dc.subjectAcquisition Life Cycle
dc.subjectContract
dc.titleCustomizing the Use of TINA (Truth in Negotiations Act) in the DoD
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SYM-AM-17-045.pdf647.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.