Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1734
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPrashant R. Patel
dc.contributor.authorDavid M. Tate
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T18:00:54Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T18:00:54Z-
dc.date.issued2019-05-13
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1734-
dc.descriptionAcquisition Management / Defense Acquisition Community Contributor
dc.description.abstractThere is a strong push to change from manned toward both unmanned and optionally manned systems within the Department of Defense. There are significant open questions about how the manned versus unmanned versus optionally manned options influence costs, adaptability, operational utility, and suitability for missions. The Institute for Defense Analyses developed an approach to address these questions that links underlying physical attributes and engineering relationships to mission attributes and costs. We discuss this approach, where it fits into the acquisition process, and how it can be used to quantitatively inform the unmanned versus optionally manned discussions at both a system level and fleet level.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAcquisition Management
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSYM-AM-19-047
dc.subjectUnmanned
dc.subjectManned
dc.subjectOptionally Manned
dc.subjectSystem Level
dc.subjectFleet Level
dc.titleWhen Does It Make Sense to Acquire a Single Weapon System Design That Can Be Used in Both Manned and Unmanned Operational Modes
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SYM-AM-19-047.pdf1.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.