Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1794
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCharles Pickar
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T18:01:31Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T18:01:31Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-05
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1794-
dc.descriptionAcquisition Management / Defense Acquisition Community Contributor
dc.description.abstractIn the ever increasing complexity of defense acquisition, the traditional metrics for defense projects of cost, schedule, and performance are insufficient. This paper explores the concept of cost, schedule, and performance to determine if these three quintessential project management criteria are sufficient to serve as the guiding principles for defense project managers. The ever increasing complexity of the weapons system development environment, from the necessity for specialization to the intricacies of new technology, requires a broader view than that offered by cost, schedule, and performance. In squaring the project management circle, we must add a fourth variable, context, to provide focus. Because if we measure it, it will get done.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProject Management
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSYM-AM-16-079
dc.subjectProject Management
dc.subjectCost
dc.subjectSchedule
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.titleSquaring the Project Management Circle: Updating the Cost, Schedule, and Performance Methodology
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SYM-AM-16-079.pdf356.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.