Marines Vs. Contractors: An Analysis of a Supply Outsourcing Initiative and Its Impact on Cost and Efficiency

Abstract

Since 2001, the Marine Corps has outsourced the management of all individual issue combat gear. This contracted outsourcing, called the Consolidated Issue Facility (CIF) and then the Individual Issue Facility (IIF) under the direction of local Marine Expeditionary Force Headquarters (MEF HQ) and Marine Corps Logistics Command (LOGCOM), is responsible for the distribution, management, and collection of every Marine's individual combat issue of gear a task previously accomplished by each units individual organic supply section. By removing this burden on the supply sections, the Marine Corps was theoretically able to free-up Marines to fill billets in warfighting roles. The Marine Corps has touted the ability to save money and create efficiencies that did not exist previously with organic Marine Corps led supply operations. The Marine Corps is looking to increase the amount of assets managed by outside vendors by outsourcing management of unit assets such as soft-walled shelters and camouflage netting to a Unit Issue Facility (UIF) using the same model as the CIF/IIF. This paper explores whether the CIF/IIF program saved the Marine Corps money from 2001 through 2010, allowed for transfer of personnel to other roles, and was an effective model for future outsourcing endeavors.