Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2044
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTimothy R. Shives
dc.contributor.authorLaban M. Pelz
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T18:07:51Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T18:07:51Z-
dc.date.issued2012-09-05
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2044-
dc.descriptionInformation Technology / Graduate Student Research
dc.description.abstractThis research examined the ongoing development of a Marine Corps wide, enterprise architecture (EA) approach for assessing the IT planning and investment process, including IT-related programs of record. The enterprise architecture approach to architecture, known as the Marine Corps Information Enterprise Technology Strategy (MCIENT-S), is intended to transition the Marine Corps into the 21st century by providing Marine Corps leadership with superior decision support. This study evaluated planning and implementation strategies against return on investment (ROI) and requirements-based Capabilities Based Assessment (CBA) processes in their contrasting measures of effectiveness. By analyzing the current and proposed additional IT investment performance metrics to enhance the enterprise architecture, the study learned of the need to conduct an organizational analysis of the Marine Corps IT development and portfolio management process. The study begins with a baseline understanding of the current financial environment of enterprise architecture from the initial and rapid growth in defense-specific IT acquisitions since 9/11 into the current fiscally constrained environment of fiscal year (FY) 2013. The rising trend of the last decade of defense (IT) investment yields its own unintended consequences. One noted conclusion is that some procurements have unfortunately occurred outside the intended parameters of the enterprise architecture framework and the DoD acquisition process, thereby creating consequences in IT governance. One recommendation for the Marine Corps leadership is to develop a systematic process to link the MCIENT-S and its two primary ROI processes, Capital Planning Investment Control (CPIC) and Information Technology Steering Group (ITSG), to the Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC) requirements-based CBA process.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInformation Technology Acquisition
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNPS-IT-12-176
dc.subjectInformation Technology Framework
dc.subjectInformation Technology Acquisition
dc.subjectPortfolio Governance
dc.subjectIT
dc.subjectReturn on Investment
dc.subjectRequirements Based Capabilities Based Assessment (CBA)
dc.titleAnalyzing the U.S. Marine Corps Enterprise Information Technology Framework for IT Acquisition and Portfolio Governance
dc.typeTechnical Report
Appears in Collections:NPS Graduate Student Theses & Reports

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
NPS-IT-12-176.pdf2.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.