Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/21
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNPS Acquisition Research Program
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T17:05:18Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T17:05:18Z-
dc.date.issued2004-09-01
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/21-
dc.descriptionAcquisition Management / Defense Acquisition Community Contributor
dc.description.abstractMany in the Department of Defense associate the phase acquisition reform with major policy and legislative initiatives of the past decade, for example, the shift away from reliance on military unique specifications and standards, the emphasis on teaming, the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA), and the Clinger-Cohen Act. While we should never discount the significance of these measures, the view that the 1990s were the genesis of acquisition reform diminishes perspective of the long history of reform efforts linked to names such as Goldwater, Nichols, Grace, Carlucci, Packard, and Hoover, to name but a few. Indeed, these efforts extend back in our history to the Continental Congress attempts to reform the buying practices of General Washington's Army. Considering this history, reform may well be acquisition's defining theme.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSymposium Proceedings
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNPS-AM-04-005
dc.subjectProceedings of the 1st Annual Acquisition Research Symposium
dc.titleCharting a Course for Change: Acquisition Theory and Practice for a Transforming Defense
dc.typeBook
Appears in Collections:Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
NPS-AM-04-005.pdf6.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.