Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2260
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFrederic Albesa
dc.contributor.authorIsaac J. Ortman
dc.contributor.authorStephen F. Kirouac
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T18:09:24Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T18:09:24Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-01
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2260-
dc.descriptionLogistics Management / Graduate Student Research
dc.description.abstractThe military spends resources ensuring individual warfighter equipment is technologically advanced and operationally effective/suitable. Certain types of warfighter equipment, specifically durable goods, have long service lives; therefore, services cannot afford to replace all warfighter equipment when advances in capability or weight reduction are achieved. However, like pre-positioned stocks of heavy combat equipment, having stocks of modern warfighter equipment in a non-contingent environment ready for early deployers ensures readiness and buys time for industrial base ramp-up. The Deployer Equipment Bundle (DEB) concept would outfit early deploying brigade combat teams (BCTs) to the next major contingency with the most modern, lifesaving equipment available, providing sufficient buffer stock to enable the industrial base to ramp up to full capacity. This concept procures organizational clothing and individual protective equipment (OCIE) and personal protective equipment (PPE) for immediate capability needs and includes flame-resistant (FR) uniforms. The DEB concept increases flexibility while reducing operational risks to the Army. We found that an effective implementation of a DEB concept should leverage the best practices of the Army Rapid Field Initiative (RFI) operations, Army Pre-positioned Stocks (APS) operations, and United States Marine Corps Individual Clothing and Combat Equipment (ICCE) operations. In addition, our research identified the barriers and challenges to the acceptance of the DEB concept: aversion to change, ignorance to new concepts, Army culture, and trust.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGround Support Equipment
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNPS-LM-17-202
dc.subjectDeployer Equipment Bundle
dc.subjectSoldier Protection System
dc.subjectPrepositioning Equipment
dc.subjectOrganizational Clothing
dc.subjectCritical Combat Equipment
dc.subjectReadiness
dc.subjectRapid Fielding Initiative
dc.subjectLifesaving Equipment
dc.subjectPersonal Protective Equipment
dc.subjectFire-Retardant Uniforms
dc.subjectBarrier to Acceptance
dc.titleInnovative Defense Acquisition Concept Deployer Equipment Bundle (DEB)
dc.typeTechnical Report
Appears in Collections:NPS Graduate Student Theses & Reports

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
NPS-LM-17-202.pdf3.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.