Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2559
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEllsworth Johnson
dc.contributor.authorBryan Paton
dc.contributor.authorEdward Threat
dc.contributor.authorLisa Haptonstall
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T18:18:22Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T18:18:22Z-
dc.date.issued2005-06-01
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2559-
dc.descriptionContract Management / NPS Faculty Research
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this Master Business Administration (MBA) Professional Report is to investigate and analyze the means by which Contingency Contracting Officers (CCO) can effectively operate in a Joint contingency environment and to validate the Defense Contract Management Agency's (DCMA) entry and exit criteria for contingency contracting missions. Joint contingencies encompass regional conflicts, humanitarian and peacekeeping missions, and international or domestic disaster relief missions supported with the immediate deployment of military forces. This research was accomplished by reviewing the current guidance, policies, and doctrine pertinent to contingency contracting operations and conducting personal interviews. The researchers conducted interviews with representatives of the Joint Staff, J4 (Logistics), each Service Component's acquisition headquarters, U.S. Central Command's J4 (Logistics), U.S. Pacific Command's J4 (Logistics, Engineering, and Security Assistance), and the DCMA to explore how contingency contracting operations are planned and executed; current issues and lessons learned; and understand the current structure/organization of Service Component and Combatant Command for accomplishing contingency contracting. Conclusions and recommendations address perceived shortfalls in the methodologies the Services use to plan, communicate, integrate and execute contingency contracting operations. Three possible solutions to these shortfalls include adoption of the Yoder Three-Tier Model, establishment of the Joint Contingency Contracting Command (JCCC), and the creation of universal language for conducting contracting in contingencies.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesContingency Contracting
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNPS-CM-05-015
dc.subjectContingency Contracting Officers (CCO)
dc.subjectJoint Contingency
dc.subjectDefense Contract Management Agency (DCMA)
dc.subjectYoder Three-Tier Model
dc.subjectJoint Contingency Contracting Command (JCCC)
dc.titleJoint Contingency Contracting
dc.typeTechnical Report
Appears in Collections:Sponsored Acquisition Research & Technical Reports

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
NPS-CM-05-015.pdf2.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.