Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2794
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRaymond (Chip) Franck
dc.contributor.authorJohn Dillard
dc.contributor.authorFrancois Melese
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T18:20:20Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T18:20:20Z-
dc.date.issued2006-12-01
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2794-
dc.descriptionAcquisition Logistics / NPS Faculty Research
dc.description.abstractThis study examines defense acquisition through the new lens of Transaction Cost Economics (TCE). TCE is an emergent field in economics that has multiple applications to defense acquisition practices. TCE's original focus was to guide make-or-buy decisions that define the boundaries of a firm. This study reviews insights afforded by TCE that impact government outsourcing (buy decisions), paying special attention to defense procurement. The study offers a brief synthesis and review of current Defense acquisition practices. The Department of Defense (DoD) is a unique enterprise that relies heavily on outsourcing. Outsourcing transactions are governed using a wide variety of contracts that share risk between the government and the contractor. Cost, schedule, and technical performance are widely accepted as success parameters in public and private transactions. While recently enacted defense acquisition practices address many of the issues raised by TCE, a key concept called asset specificity seems to have been overlooked. The lock-in effect achieved by contractors that invest in specific assets, while benefiting the government in the short run, can haunt the government in the long run. The risk is that, after winning a bidding competition, a contractor that invests in specific assets might eventually become a sole supplier that hold up the government, resulting in higher costs, schedule delays, or disappointing performance. We discuss some new and old solutions to the holdup problem. We conclude by offering a number of insights for defense acquisition program managers generated by the new perspective of TCE. Whereas there is no universal template for the management and governance of complex and uncertain defense outsourcing relationships, TCE offers a valuable new perspective to improve the design and management of those relationships.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTransaction Cost Economics (TCE)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNPS-LM-06-028
dc.subjectContracts
dc.subjectCosts
dc.subjectIncentives
dc.subjectProgram Management
dc.subjectCompetitive Sourcing
dc.titleA Transactions Cost Economics Approach to Defense Acquisition Management
dc.typeTechnical Report
Appears in Collections:Sponsored Acquisition Research & Technical Reports

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
NPS-LM-06-028.pdf715.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.