Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLawrence Jones
dc.contributor.authorJerry McCaffery
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.descriptionAcquisition Management / NPS Faculty Research
dc.description.abstractThis report serves three purposes. Our first purpose is to assess the future of the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution System (PPBES) and related budget reforms and to suggest that it may take more that a marginal adjustment to the current PPBES process to plan and budget most effectively for national defense and weapons acquisition. In this regard, we recommend that the DOD, and the federal government as a whole, adopt a capital budgeting process. The second purpose is to review and assess previous acquisition reforms in DOD, many of which continue into the present. The third purpose is to assess modification of the current acquisition process to improve the business processes imbedded within this system, as well as to make the overall process operate more efficiently.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBudget Reform
dc.subjectBudget Reform
dc.subjectCapital Budgeting Process
dc.subjectAcquisition Reform
dc.titleBudgeting and Acquisition Business Process Reform
dc.typeTechnical Report
Appears in Collections:Sponsored Acquisition Research & Technical Reports

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
NPS-AM-07-122.pdf322.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.