Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2944
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSarah Glassman
dc.contributor.authorMichael Head
dc.contributor.authorDavid G. Tuerck
dc.contributor.authorPaul Bachman
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T14:40:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-07T14:40:05Z-
dc.date.issued2008-02-01
dc.identifier.citationUnlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2944-
dc.description.abstractOne feature of public construction projects that the critics seem less willing to recognize is that they function also as a costly welfare system for union workers. This feature stems from the federal Davis-Bacon Act, under which construction projects funded entirely or in part by the federal government must pay a government determined prevailing wage to the workers on the project. While the Davis-Bacon Act (DBA) gets periodic attention from Congress and various critics, there is a general unawareness of the arcane and generally unrepresentative statistical calculations that underlie its enforcement. The purpose of this study is to unearth the methods behind these calculations, to identify some of the anomalies they produce and to estimate what they cost taxpayers.
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherBeacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocioeconomic Policy - Davis-Bacon Act
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSEC809-MKT-08-0079
dc.subjectDavis-Bacon Act
dc.subjectDynamic Marketplace
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Policy
dc.subjectMethodology
dc.titleThe Federal Davis-Bacon Act: The Prevailing Mismeasure of Wages
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Section 809 Panel: Reports, Recommendations & Resource Library

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SEC809-MKT-08-0079.pdf505.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.