Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3551
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeghan Doherty
dc.contributor.authorAlexander Ginsberg
dc.contributor.authorToghrul Shukurlu
dc.contributor.authorRobert Starling
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T16:17:04Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-07T16:17:04Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-24
dc.identifier.citationUnlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3551-
dc.descriptionhttps://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/section-809-panel-installment-one-11043/
dc.description.abstractSeveral of the Section 809 Panel's recommendations would change the procurement landscape by significantly curtailing the bid protest process and limiting judicial review of procurement decisions.
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherJDSUPRA (Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMedia - SEC809
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSEC809-RL-19-0024
dc.subjectSection 809 Panel
dc.subjectAcquisition Reform
dc.subjectBid Protests
dc.subjectJudicial Review
dc.subjectCourt of Federal Claims
dc.titleSection 809 Panel Installment One: Expanding Agency Procurement Discretion, Narrowing Contractors Bid Protest Rights Recommended
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Section 809 Panel: Reports, Recommendations & Resource Library

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SEC809-RL-19-0024.pdf575.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.