Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3591
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSection 809 Panel
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T16:46:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-07T16:46:44Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-15
dc.identifier.citationUnlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3591-
dc.description.abstractThe current reprogramming process in the Department of Defense involves too many levels of approval, and it does not allow for delegation of decision authority to the mid-and lower-levels of the acquisition system. Definitions of appropriations lifecycle categories should be clarified to encourage program offices to focus more on whether capabilities are being delivered, and less on coordinating the timing of the funding for a system's lifecycle phases. This change would facilitate the broader transition to a portfolio-based model for defense acquisition programs laid out in recommendations by the Section 809 Panel.
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States Government
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherSection 809 Panel
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResource Allocation
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSEC809-RSC-19-0008
dc.subjectPlanning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Process
dc.subjectReprogramming
dc.subjectSection 809 Panel
dc.subjectBudget
dc.subjectPortfolio Management
dc.titleSection 809 Panel - Recommendation #46 - Empower the Acquisition Community by Delegating Below Threshold Reprogramming Decision Authority to Portfolio Acquisition Executives
dc.title.alternativeSection 809 Panel - Recommendation #46
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Section 809 Panel: Reports, Recommendations & Resource Library

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SEC809-RSC-19-0008.pdf488.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.