Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3649
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSection 809 Panel
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T16:47:02Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-07T16:47:02Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-15
dc.identifier.citationUnlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3649-
dc.description.abstractThe definition of the term significant deficiency for contractor business systems in Section 893 of the Fiscal Year 2011 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) does not align with generally accepted auditing standards for evaluating and reporting on internal control deficiencies. This lack of consistency creates confusion regarding the identification, severity, meaning, and resolution of deficiencies. The term significant deficiency and its definition need to be stricken and replaced with the term material weakness.
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States Government
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherSection 809 Panel
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSimplified Acquisition
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSEC809-SMP-19-0011
dc.subjectContractor Business System
dc.subjectSignificant Deficiency
dc.subjectMaterial Weakness
dc.subjectAudit Process
dc.subjectSection 809 Panel
dc.subjectFiscal Year 2011 National Defense Authorization Act
dc.subjectDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)
dc.subjectSimplify Acquisition
dc.titleSection 809 Panel - Recommendation #73 - Revise the definition of business system deficiencies to more closely align with generally accepted auditing standards
dc.title.alternativeSection 809 Panel - Recommendation #73
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Section 809 Panel: Reports, Recommendations & Resource Library

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SEC809-SMP-19-0011.pdf864.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.