Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3711
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavid Berteau
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T16:47:25Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-07T16:47:25Z-
dc.date.issued2017-04-06
dc.identifier.citationUnlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3711-
dc.description.abstractToday I will make several specific recommendations on the roles and responsibilities of the Defense Contracting Audit Agency (DCAA) below. I will also offer some priorities and criteria that PSC would urge you to keep in mind as your subcommittee focuses on evaluating the defense contract auditing process, both in this hearing and in your future efforts. They include: defining proper materiality and relevance standards for contract audits, sustaining a robust contractor base, ensuring vendors remain interested in bidding, and helping the government's acquisition processes provide better access to innovation.
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherProfessional Services Council
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSimplify Acquisition - Audit and Oversight
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSEC809-SMP-17-0064
dc.subjectSimplify Acquisition
dc.subjectAudit
dc.subjectOversight
dc.subjectCongress
dc.subjectMateriality
dc.subjectContractor
dc.subjectDefense Cost Accounting Standards Board
dc.subjectCost Accounting Standards
dc.subjectDefense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA)
dc.titleEvaluating the Defense Contract Auditing Process
dc.title.alternativeTestimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations House Committee on Armed Services, U.S. House of Representatives
dc.typeOther
Appears in Collections:Section 809 Panel: Reports, Recommendations & Resource Library

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SEC809-SMP-17-0064.pdf429.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.