Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3714
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Andrew George Sakallari | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-07T16:47:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-07T16:47:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007-06-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Unlimited Distribution | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3714 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The use of small business set asides has generated consequences that run counter to some of the fundamental principles of government contracting, most notably the principles that full and open competition should be the norm, that procurement awards should be based on "best value" considering price and quality, and that all contractors should be given equal opportunity to compete. Despite these contradictions, set asides have survived due largely to their widespread appeal. | |
dc.language | English (United States) | |
dc.publisher | Public Contract Law Journal | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Socioeconomic Policy | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | SEC809-MKT-07-0057.pdf | |
dc.subject | Socioeconomic Policy | |
dc.subject | Dynamic Marketplace | |
dc.subject | Small Business Act | |
dc.subject | Small Business Set-Aside | |
dc.subject | Industry Base | |
dc.subject | Competition | |
dc.subject | Small Business | |
dc.title | Questioning the Sacred Cow: Reexamining the Justifications for Small Business Set Asides | |
dc.type | Article | |
Appears in Collections: | Section 809 Panel: Reports, Recommendations & Resource Library |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
SEC809-MKT-07-0057.pdf | 2.55 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.