Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3714
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAndrew George Sakallari
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T16:47:26Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-07T16:47:26Z-
dc.date.issued2007-06-01
dc.identifier.citationUnlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3714-
dc.description.abstractThe use of small business set asides has generated consequences that run counter to some of the fundamental principles of government contracting, most notably the principles that full and open competition should be the norm, that procurement awards should be based on "best value" considering price and quality, and that all contractors should be given equal opportunity to compete. Despite these contradictions, set asides have survived due largely to their widespread appeal.
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherPublic Contract Law Journal
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocioeconomic Policy
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSEC809-MKT-07-0057.pdf
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Policy
dc.subjectDynamic Marketplace
dc.subjectSmall Business Act
dc.subjectSmall Business Set-Aside
dc.subjectIndustry Base
dc.subjectCompetition
dc.subjectSmall Business
dc.titleQuestioning the Sacred Cow: Reexamining the Justifications for Small Business Set Asides
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Section 809 Panel: Reports, Recommendations & Resource Library

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SEC809-MKT-07-0057.pdf2.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.