Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3760
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChristine Tracey
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T17:21:50Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-07T17:21:50Z-
dc.date.issued2001-06-01
dc.identifier.citationUnlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3760-
dc.description.abstractThis Comment will discuss the Davis-Bacon Act provisions and their current implementation. It will then analyze the arguments for and against the repeal of Davis-Bacon, and look at the impact of repeal in states that have eliminated their little Davis-Bacon laws. Finally, this Comment will make recommendations concerning the repeal of the federal and state Davis-Bacon Acts, and by extension both the Walsh-Healey Act and the Service Contract Act, and address the potential need for government support in some narrow areas of the construction industry.
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherThe Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocioeconomic Policy - Davis-Bacon Act
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSEC809-MKT-01-0066
dc.subjectDavis-Bacon Act
dc.subjectDynamic Marketplace
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Policy
dc.subjectWage Law
dc.subjectWalsh-Healey Act
dc.subjectConstruction
dc.subjectRepeal
dc.subjectService Contract Act
dc.subjectService Contracting
dc.titleAn Argument for the Repeal of the Davis-Bacon Act
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Section 809 Panel: Reports, Recommendations & Resource Library

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SEC809-MKT-01-0066.pdf73.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.