Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/4183
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorgan Dwyer-
dc.contributor.authorBrenen Tidwell-
dc.contributor.authorAlec Blivas-
dc.contributor.authorAndrew Hunter-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-02T18:16:14Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-02T18:16:14Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-30-
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distributionen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/4183-
dc.descriptionAcquisition Management / Defense Acquisition Community Contributoren_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper assesses the relationship between cycles of acquisition reform and cycle-times (i.e., the time to field new capabilities). First, we characterize the history of defense reform in terms of cycles that centralize or decentralize oversight. Next, using schedule data from over 200 Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs), we evaluate past reforms’ impact on MDAP cycle-time. We observe that, historically, centralized oversight correlates with lower rates of cycle-time growth but that cycle-times have remained relatively unchanged throughout defense reform cycles. Finally, we conclude that, similar to past reform cycles which decentralized oversight, today’s reforms may not increase the speed with which the Defense Department acquires MDAPs.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Programen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Programen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAcquisition Reform;SYM-AM-20-046-
dc.subjectAcquisition Reformen_US
dc.subjectCyclesen_US
dc.titleCycle-times and Cycles of Acquisition Reformen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SYM-AM-20-046.pdf486.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.