Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/4538
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRobert F. Mortlock, Raymond D. Jones-
dc.contributor.authorConor W. Stewart, Adam T. Deitrich-
dc.contributor.authorJordan M. Reid-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-10T21:00:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-10T21:00:57Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-10-
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distributionen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/4538-
dc.descriptionProgram Management / Faculty Reporten_US
dc.description.abstractThis research performed a gap analysis on the existing Department of Defense (DoD) program management competency standards to determine if changes are required to fully adopt product portfolio management (PPM) strategies in defense acquisition. Current DoD program management standards are compared to the Project Management Institute's Portfolio Management Professional certification standards to analyze alignment and gaps between the standards. Barrier to Implementation (BTI) scores are assigned to address the identified gaps in the DoD standard. The study found that the DoD program management competencies are on average 41% aligned with portfolio management industry standards. The DoD program management competencies are least aligned with the portfolio management domains of governance and strategic alignment. The composite BTI score indicates low to medium level of implementation barriers for most of the gaps. Results indicate that the DoD is capable of conducting PPM, and further research is needed to fully align the current competency standards with industry best practices. Defense acquisition senior leaders should consider formulating DoD portfolio management career field functional competencies to address congressional mandates for portfolio management implementation within the DoD.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Programen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Programen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProgram Management;NPS-PM-22-024-
dc.subjectportfolio managementen_US
dc.subjectprogram managementen_US
dc.subjectgap analysisen_US
dc.subjectNDAA acquisition guidanceen_US
dc.subjectacquisition reform and innovationen_US
dc.titleProgram Management versus Portfolio Management in Defense Acquisitionen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
Appears in Collections:Sponsored Acquisition Research & Technical Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NPS-PM-22-024.pdfTechnical Report3.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.