Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/4601
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJordan Pierce-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T21:47:43Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-05T21:47:43Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-05-
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distributionen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/4601-
dc.descriptionSymposium Student Posteren_US
dc.description.abstractThe failed AAAV/EFV program cost the taxpayers $3 billion from 1988 to 2011. WHY? Bona fide need to replace aging AAV EFV requirements challenges EFV reliability and testing issues Did the ACV learn from the EFV program?en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Programen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Programen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAcquisition Management;SYM-AM-22-105-
dc.subjectAmphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV)en_US
dc.subjectAssault Amphibious Vehicle (AAV)-
dc.subjectExpeditionary-
dc.subjectCombat Vehicle-
dc.titleComparative Case Study: Expeditionary Combat Vehicle (EFV) Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV)en_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
Appears in Collections:Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SYM-AM-22-105.pdfStudent Poster532.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.