Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/4951
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | William Colmenares, Spencer Witlz | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-05T23:14:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-05T23:14:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06-05 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/4951 | - |
dc.description | SYM Student Poster | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Commander, Naval Surface Forces is divided into two distinct type commanders, Commander, Naval Surface Force Atlantic, and Commander, Naval Surface Force Pacific. They are charged with supervising all United States Navy surface ship activities. both commands serve the same purpose and use the same instructions for guidance, however their structure and execution of processes are not aligned. Using the organizational congruence model (Nadler & Tushman, 1980), we compared both command approaches, and their manning, in attempt to determine which command is more effective at ensuring ship readiness for deployment and combat, with an emphasis on Combat Systems. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Acquisition Research Program | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Acquisition Research Program | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Acquisition Management;SYM-AM-23-179 | - |
dc.subject | Student Poster | en_US |
dc.title | A Comparative Analysis of Naval Surface Forces Atlantic and Pacific Combat Systems Departments | en_US |
dc.type | Presentation | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
SYM-AM-23-179.pdf | Student Poster | 306.55 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.