Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/559
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLloyd Brodsky
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T17:29:41Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T17:29:41Z-
dc.date.issued2009-04-01
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/559-
dc.descriptionAcquisition Management / Grant-funded Research
dc.description.abstractGovernance is widely viewed in the SOA literature as essential to successful SOA deployments. That literature generally draws little distinction between in-house projects and those carried out by contractors. Because the relationship with contractors is negotiated and managed by the acquisition unit, this paper finds it essential that acquisition integrate the decisions of governance both into solicitation documents and the resulting contracts for outsourced development or operations. It identifies what should be in a model SOA contract, paying particular attention to specifying, monitoring, and enforcing service-level agreements and alternative dispute resolution.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesService-oriented Architecture (SOA)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNPS-AM-09-032
dc.subjectService-Oriented Architecture (SOA)
dc.subjectService-Level Agreements (SLAs)
dc.subjectAlternative Dispute Resolution
dc.subjectNet-Centricity Policy
dc.titleAligning Acquisition Practice with Net-centricity Policy
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
NPS-AM-09-032.pdf104.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.