Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/84
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEdward G. Keating
dc.contributor.authorRobert Murphy
dc.contributor.authorJohn F. Schank
dc.contributor.authorJohn Birkler
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T17:05:39Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-16T17:05:39Z-
dc.date.issued2008-04-01
dc.identifier.citationPublished--Unlimited Distribution
dc.identifier.urihttps://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/84-
dc.descriptionAcquisition Management / Grant-funded Research
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes how the US Navy structures fixed-price and fixed-price, incentive-fee shipbuilding contracts and how labor- and material-cost indexes can mitigate shipbuilder risk in either type of contract. The Navy frequently uses the Steel Vessel material-cost index, a Bureau of Labor Statistics-derived cost index based on the mix of materials in a typical commercial cargo ship constructed in the 1950s. The Steel Vessel Index has excessive weighting on iron and steel, thereby providing shipbuilders with a mismatch between their actual and the Index-assumed material-cost structure. We recommend the Navy use a material-cost index with more up-to-date weightings.
dc.description.sponsorshipAcquisition Research Program
dc.languageEnglish (United States)
dc.publisherAcquisition Research Program
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFixed-price
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNPS-AM-08-039
dc.subjectFixed-Price Shipbuilding Contract
dc.subjectFixed-Price
dc.subjectIncentive-Fee Shipbuilding Contract
dc.subjectLabor-Cost Index
dc.subjectMaterial-Cost Index
dc.titleUsing the Steel Vessel Material-cost Index to Mitigate Shipbuilder Risk
dc.typeArticle
Appears in Collections:Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
NPS-AM-08-039.pdf142 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.