Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1755
Title: A Robust Framework for Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)
Authors: Moshe Kress
Brian Morgan
Keywords: Analysis of Alternatives AoA
Alternatives
Criteria
Scenarios
Stakeholders
Structured Paradigm
Ratio-Scale Matrices
Euclidean Norm
Issue Date: 13-May-2019
Publisher: Acquisition Research Program
Citation: Published--Unlimited Distribution
Series/Report no.: Acquisition Management
SYM-AM-19-065
Abstract: Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) is a complex multi-dimensional decision procedure used by the U.S. Department of Defense as part of the acquisition process. The four dimensions of the procedure are alternatives, criteria, scenarios, and stakeholders. Current AoA studies lack the structural rigor needed from such a complex procedure, which involves measurements, evaluations, analyses, and modeling, as well as social and group-decision aspects all in a highly uncertain environment. We propose a structured paradigm for conducting AoA, rooted in well-established methods of multi-criteria decision analysis. The core of the methodology comprises the concepts of ratio-scale matrices and the Euclidean norm. The ratio-scale matrices are used to elicit evaluations, preferences, and opinions from individual stakeholders and analysts, and the Euclidean norm is utilized to mitigate possible preference inconsistencies and help form consensus.
Description: Acquisition Management / Defense Acquisition Community Contributor
URI: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1755
Appears in Collections:Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
SYM-AM-19-065.pdf502.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.