Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2711
Title: An Empirical Study on Content Analysis Use in Test and Evaluation Deficiency Report Analysis
Authors: Karen S. Holness
Ph.D.
Keywords: Content Analysis
Categorization
Test and Evaluation
Deficiency Reports
Systems Engineering
Issue Date: 11-Oct-2017
Publisher: Acquisition Research Program
Citation: Published--Unlimited Distribution
Series/Report no.: Test and Evaluation
NPS-TE-18-005
Abstract: This research investigated strategies and heuristics used to prioritize system deficiencies identified during test and evaluation. Five participants were recruited to participate in this laboratory study, and were assigned to an experiment condition either with or without content analysis training. Content analysis is a well known methodology for identifying patterns and themes in qualitative datasets. In either experiment condition, subjects were asked to (1) classify a set of flight simulator deficiencies, (2) develop a deficiency resolution priority order using those classifications, and (3) complete a set of questionnaires regarding the completion of these tasks and demographic information. Across the five subjects, there was fairly high variability in the strategies and methods used. Therefore, the impact of the content analysis training was inconclusive. However, the variety of observed approaches warrants future research, specifically into the use of multiple categorization schemes when deciding upon a deficiency resolution priority order.
Description: Test and Evaluation (T&E) / NPS Faculty Research
URI: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2711
Appears in Collections:Sponsored Acquisition Research & Technical Reports

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
NPS-TE-18-005.pdf607.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.