Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2773
Title: Actual Obligations Versus Comptroller Projected Obligations Rates
Authors: Seamus P. Daniels
Todd Harrison
Keywords: Obligations Rates
Comptroller
Calculating
Research Challenges
Execution Benchmarks
Issue Date: 31-Oct-2019
Publisher: Acquisition Research Program
Citation: Published--Unlimited Distribution
Series/Report no.: Costing
CSIS-FM-20-005
Abstract: This paper seeks to enhance understanding of the formulation and accuracy of Department of Defense (DoD) Comptroller projected obligation rates in the defense acquisition sector. These projections are published annually for each appropriation account in the Financial Summary Tables released by the office of the DoD Comptroller. This paper compares the Comptroller projected obligation rates for procurement and research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) accounts with actual obligation rates as well as budget execution benchmarks also compiled by the Comptroller's office. It assesses the reliability of the projections and their consistency with other DoD targets, identifies trends in the accuracy of obligation rates across different accounts, and attempts to isolate factors that may influence the formulation and accuracy of the projections.
Description: Contract Management / Grant-funded Research
URI: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/2773
Appears in Collections:Sponsored Acquisition Research & Technical Reports

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
CSIS-FM-20-005.pdf2.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.