Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3622
Title: | Section 809 Panel - Recommendation #15 - Clarify and Streamline the Definition of and Requirements for an Adequate Incurred Cost Proposal to Refocus the Purpose of the Department of Defense's Oversight |
Other Titles: | Section 809 Panel - Recommendation #15 |
Authors: | Section 809 Panel |
Keywords: | Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Oversight Audit Process Indirect Cost Incurred Cost Proposal Section 809 Panel Simplify Acquisition |
Issue Date: | 31-Jan-2018 |
Publisher: | Section 809 Panel |
Citation: | Unlimited Distribution |
Series/Report no.: | Simplified Acquisition SEC809-SMP-18-0011 |
Abstract: | The term incurred cost proposal is not defined within federal acquisition regulations, the effect of which has been to create unnecessary burdens on both the government and contractors. In recent years, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) began auditing direct costs, as well as indirect costs, during its incurred cost audits. DCAA should not be auditing direct contract costs unless requested to do so by the contracting officer as set forth in the Federal Acquisition Regulation. |
URI: | https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/3622 |
Appears in Collections: | Section 809 Panel: Reports, Recommendations & Resource Library |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
SEC809-SMP-18-0011.pdf | 747.61 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.