Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/5454
Title: Case Study: International Burden Sharing in Alliances & Coalitions
Authors: Philip J. Candreva, David Kaczorowski
Keywords: alliance
burden sharing
military expenditure
Issue Date: 15-Aug-2025
Publisher: Acquisition Research Program
Citation: APA 7
Series/Report no.: Acquisition Management;NPS-AM-25-479
Abstract: There are several normative theories for how the costs of running a coalition military operation or sustaining an alliance should be distributed among the members. The reality is that this becomes a matter of diplomacy and negotiation. This case study has students allocate the burden of a five-member military coalition using three approaches: ability to pay, capacity to contribute, and a complex qualitative approach based on a risk-sharing theory and incorporating descriptions of the member nations and their leaders. The case could be used in courses in national security policy, public budgeting, international affairs, or political science. It illustrates theories of alliances, conceptions of fairness, monetary and non-monetary costs of participation in such endeavors, and the effects of political ideologies on such decisions.
Description: Case Study
URI: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/5454
Appears in Collections:Sponsored Acquisition Research & Technical Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NPS-AM-25-479.pdfCase Study455.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.