Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1421
Title: | Customizing the Use of TINA (Truth in Negotiations Act) in the DoD |
Authors: | Chong Wang |
Keywords: | TINA Truth in Negotiations Act Acquisition Life Cycle Contract |
Issue Date: | 30-Mar-2017 |
Publisher: | Acquisition Research Program |
Citation: | Published--Unlimited Distribution |
Series/Report no.: | Acquisition SYM-AM-17-045 |
Abstract: | TINA, as it currently stands, is a one-size-fits-all prescription. Specifically, TINA does not differentiate among various settings involving different acquisition category, acquisition life cycle, and corresponding preferred contract type. We propose to tailor the use or disuse of TINA to different scenarios by considering the economic incentives created by TINA enforcement. In some settings where TINA is misplaced, we propose to drop TINA to remove the ill incentives and consequent unintended negative consequences. In other settings where TINA brings more benefit than cost, we recommend keeping TINA in place. In a few settings where the judgment is not unambiguous, we propose to leave the discretion to decision makers. |
Description: | Acquisition Management / Defense Acquisition Community Contributor |
URI: | https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/1421 |
Appears in Collections: | Annual Acquisition Research Symposium Proceedings & Presentations |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
SYM-AM-17-045.pdf | 647.16 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.